Be it special events such as Christmas and Thanksgiving, or sons who return home from the War- family gatherings are occasions that call for a celebration. But in Christie’s novels, things always manage to go the wrong way. Money, rivalry or revenge- whatever the motive may be, readers love a juicy family drama where the saying “blood is thicker than water” may not always hold true.
After the Funeral (1953)
The first title that leaps to my mind whenever Christie and family are mentioned in one sentence. A murder that occurs within a household mourning the death of another member, and a second murder to follow with it- makes an interesting basis for a story that deviates from her usual plot. Curling up in bed on a rainy night, this book makes a chillingly good read for those who love cold-blooded suspense. After all, can the dead ever lie in peace when the body count keeps rising after the funerals?
The Mysterious Affair at Styles (1920)
Christie’s first-ever published work, in which the renowned Belgian detective Hercule Poirot makes his debut. Poirot finds himself entangled in a murderous family affair, where the family matriarch is apparently killed by a member of the household. Rather a good effort by Christie for her first attempt at whodunits, but definitely not a title that deserves to be on the Top 10 (or even 20) of my list. Somehow, the idea of Poirot running around the village with test tubes and tasting samples from coffee cups does not appeal to me at all. Rather elementary for a great detective who claims to do all his work with his “little grey cells”.
Crooked House (1949)
Malice runs in the blood- this seems to be particularly true for members of the Leonides family. When three generations of them come to live under one roof, troubles start brewing before anyone could suspect a thing. When the old bully patriarch Aristide Leonides died poisoned by his own eye medicine, each of the rather psychologically “crooked” surviving members finds themselves becoming a suspect in the case. With the air of apprehension climbing up a notch everytime the murderer strikes, will the family be able to unmask the culprit in time?
Ordeal by Innocence (1958)
It was not until now that I realise how much this title has in common with Crooked House. Both are noticeably psychological in nature (not much action takes place here), and Ordeal stresses repeatedly on the state of mind of the innocents living in fear knowing that a murderer is among the flock. Readers are brought into the story through the eyes of a distinct outsider, who is introduced into the family early in the story and attempts to act as an amateur sleuth of sorts. Christie named these two as her favourite works of all time.
Hercule Poirot’s Christmas (1938)
The plot for this title somehow feels like an overused recipe to me; the ingredients being Crooked House (nasty family head), The Murder of Roger Ackroyd (impossible locked-room murder) and The Mousetrap all cooked up together in an attempt to bring a new story to life. A long-due family gathering for Christmas turns fatal for Simeon Lee, the tyrannical old man in the Lee family who had tried to stage a wicked play for his estranged children but got the tables turned on himself instead.
Appointment with Death (1938)
Continuing on the saga of deadly family affairs, a different setting brings a breath of fresh air into the usual Christies. Rather than getting cooped up in dreary English homes, the characters embark on an overseas family vacation to the Middle East where murder is not far behind. The only thing that seems wrong with the Boynton family is their lack of life even before anyone starts getting killed; the psychological influence of the matriarch is so strong that apparently her grown-ups have to resort to murder to break away from her. Whether that is the truth behind the case, it is up to Poirot again to uncover justice.
Taken at the Flood (1948)
When a rich elderly man passes on, the reading of the will always turn out a nasty affair. Even more complicated is when there exists an assortment of siblings, young trophy wives and greedy in-laws, all desperately in need for money and are thus out for each other’s blood for a bigger portion of the pie. Money as an objective is used in a number of Christie’s other works- with Dumb Witness (1937) and Sad Cypress (1940) being among her less notable examples.
A Pocket Full of Rye (1953)
And making her entry here is Miss Marple, the gossipy spinster and village amateur sleuth with a penchant for knitting and gardening, and murders. Murder becomes very much a family affair for the Fortescues, when both Rex Fortescue and his young wife died poisoned through their food. Eldest son Percival and black sheep Lancelot both stand to inherit a fortune, but things get complicated when revenge is implicated in the case.
4.50 from Paddington (1957)
A chance observation on a moving train leads to a possible murder investigation at Rutherford Hall, home to the illustrious Crackenthorpe family where a large fortune and innocent lives are at stake. When one after another of the family’s heirs gets eliminated, it is clear that money plays the central role in the deadly game of murder.
Death Comes as the End (1944)
The theme of familial love (or rather, the lack of it) goes a long way back in this story- back to 2000 BC in Thebes, Egypt. When mortuary priest Imhotep brought back a young concubine Nofret, she carried along with her the seeds of hate which were then sown among the other family members. Their quiet, peaceful lives were disrupted forever when men and women alike started dying in mysterious circumstances. Was it truly the act of an ancient curse, or were there hands of malice pulling the strings from behind?
Nursery rhymes were often used in many of Christie’s works; I have counted at least eight titles associated with them. Some of them were indeed utilised brilliantly (And Then There Were None remains Christie’s biggest commercial success after more than seventy years of publication) while the others just fail to impress. Let us have a look at some of the more popular titles out there- just a reminder that this post may reveal a few key points of the plot, or even the outcome of the stories discussed.
Ten Little Indians
(And Then There Were None- 1939)
Perhaps the best example of the use of nursery rhymes by Christie. It is also my personal favourite, perhaps because I have outgrown my fondness for all the Poirots and Marples out there. The book boasts a highly original plot, with a decent count of bodies for a murder mystery, and a great conclusion. The use of the “Ten Little Soldiers” (or Niggers/ Indians) nursery rhyme here is both ingenious and practical, fitting into the plot beautifully while maintaining the element of suspense throughout the story.
Ten little Soldier boys went out to dine,
one choked his little self and then there were nine.
An exciting but rather chilling start to the story. Ten people were invited to a remote island by a mysterious host, only to find themselves getting stranded there with no way of escape. A gramophone record that plays after their first dinner accuses all ten of them of murder at some earlier point in their lives. The first victim then drops dead literally, having been poisoned by a slip of cyanide into his drink.
Nine little Soldier boys sat up very late,
one overslept himself and then there were eight.
The second murder occurs during their first night on the island; the victim dies by an overdose of sleeping draught. With each death, one of the ten figurines on the dining table is removed, installing further fear in the remaining survivors that the deaths are indeed premeditated and thus, confirming their suspicions that there is a clever murderer at work here.
Eight little Soldier boys travelling in Devon,
One said he’d stay there and then there were seven.
Seven little Soldier boys chopping up sticks,
One chopped himself in halves and then there were six.
Six little Soldier boys playing with a hive,
A bumblebee stung one and then there were five.
The subsequent murders are executed according to the rhyme. The five remaining survivors find themselves in a state of high nervous tension, each asking himself… Which one of us did it? With no way of knowing the truth, the “Soldier boys” have no other choice than to continue playing the deadly game against the mastermind, hoping to catch him in action and thus ending this nightmare once and for all. But as we know, things are never as simple as they appear to be…..
Five little Soldier boys going in for law,
One got in Chancery and then there were four.
One of the deciding moments in the story, with only four survivors remaining. The air of suspicion is heavy around them, even as each survivor finds himself going over the border of insanity…
Four little Soldier boys going out to sea,
A red herring swallowed one and then there were three.
Three little Soldier boys walking in the zoo,
A big bear hugged one and then there were two.
Two little Soldier boys sitting in the sun,
One got frizzled up and then there was one.
With each of the two remaining survivors convinced that the other party must be guilty, one of them outwits the other, thus becoming the lone survivor of the game. The tenth “Soldier boy” then returns to the house, only to find a noose hanging in her room, ready to be used.
One little Soldier boy left all alone,
He went out and hanged himself and then there were none.
In what the murderer describes as the most interesting psychological moment in the story, will the last remaining “Soldier boy” hang herself out of her guilt? The murderer gambled on that she would, and with that the rhyme is completed.
In a shocking and thought-provoking epilogue, the murderer reveals his identity through a letter, sealed in a bottle and thrown into the sea. He also states the fact that the order that the deaths occurred had been significant, with the “least guilty” ones killed off early in the game and were thus spared the psychological torment that would be felt by the remaining members. An intensely good read, with just the right amount of drama, and a thoroughly unpredictable conclusion. A true example of Christie at her very best.
My rating: 5.0/5.0
This Little Piggy
(Five Little Pigs / Murder in Retrospect- 1942)
Unlike And Then There Were None, the plot for this story does not rely much on the use of the nursery rhyme. In fact I do think that Murder in Retrospect is a better title, as it describes just exactly what the plot is about- a murder committed in retrospect, sixteen years prior to the story. Carla Lemarchant, the now grown-up daughter of the late painter Amyas Crale, approaches Poirot to re-open the investigation into her father’s death. Her mother Caroline Crale who was arrested for the case had died in the prison, and it is up to Carla now to find out the truth. But even for Hercule Poirot, investigating a murder committed sixteen years ago, one that has left nothing but cold trails, is no easy task.
This little piggy went to the market,
Readers are introduced to the first of the suspects, Philip Blake, who had supposedly “went to the market” on the day of the murder. Philip had been a stockbroker and a close friend of Amyas, but as innocent as he may seem to be, everyone has a little something to hide.
This little piggy stayed at home,
Represents Meredith Blake, the brother of Philip Blake. He happens to be an herbalist, of whom the poison coniine had been stolen from, apparently by Caroline.
This little piggy had roast beef,
Elsa Greer, a young girl who had posed as a model for Amyas’s paintings and had been his mistress at that time. She is apparently the motive for the crime, a crime of passion where Caroline had poisoned her husband out of her jealousy.
This little piggy had none,
The fourth suspect was Cecilia Williams, a governess for Caroline’s younger half-sister. Although fiercely loyal to Caroline, she seems to have little doubt of the latter’s guilt, for a reason that Poirot will later discover.
And this little piggy went wee wee wee all the way home.
The final suspect was Angela Warren, the younger half-sister of Caroline, and who was blinded in one eye when Caroline threw a paperweight at her as a young child. As more evidences are uncovered, Angela becomes a strong suspect for the murder.
I have mixed feelings on this title. While the plot is original, the story lacks suspense and the pace may get a little slow at times. With the exception of Elsa Greer and Angela Warren, the other characters have nothing much to offer and are easily forgettable. The conclusion is decent though, and overall the story is an above-average read for fans of crime fiction.
My rating: 3.5/5.0
There Was a Crooked Man
(Crooked House- 1949)
One of Christie’s own personal favourites, together with yet another psychological thriller Ordeal by Innocence. The use of nursery rhyme here serves not only as the title; it also demonstrates the state of the Leonides household perfectly- with each of the member being rather twisted psychologically, due to the influence of the domineering family head Aristide Leonides.
There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile,
He found a crooked sixpence against a crooked stile.
He bought a crooked cat, which caught a crooked mouse,
And they all lived together in a little crooked house.
Unlike the other more famous works by Christie, this novel does not feature any of the recurring characters as the main investigator. Rather, the task is taken by Charles Hayward, who acts as the narrator for the story. He is introduced to the Leonides family through Sophia Leonides, whom he is supposed to marry.
As the count of bodies in the family rise, it becomes possible to guess correctly the identity of the culprit. For one, the crimes are decidedly simple and yet incredibly clever, successful just because they were executed at the right moments. Everything makes sense only in the end when the real culprit is revealed- and the motives for the murders may send a chill down your spine for the sheer spitefulness behind them. A highly enjoyable title altogether; I would personally recommend this if you have not read it.
My rating: 4.5/ 5.0
Sing a Song of Sixpence
(A Pocket Full of Rye- 1953)
One of my personal favourites from the Miss Marple series. Like And Then There Were None, the use of nursery rhyme here relates to the actual murders as well, and they are rather well-executed.
Sing a song of sixpence, a pocket full of rye;
Four and twenty blackbirds, baked in a pie.
When the pie was opened, the birds began to sing;
Wasn’t that a dainty dish, to set before the king?
The plot for this story revolves around Rex Fortescue, a rich businessman and the various family members of the Fortescue household. Rex, who had some rather shady business dealings in his past, is reminded of one particular incident involving the Blackbird Mine in Africa when someone in his household plays pranks on him by placing dead blackbirds around the house (and hence, the first reference to the rhyme).
In the Blackbird Mine incident, Rex had apparently swindled his business partner at that time, a man called MacKenzie. The MacKenzie family was ruined; this is supposedly one of the motives for the later murders- revenge for a past wrongdoing.
The King was in his counting house, counting out his money;
The first murder takes place early in the story- that of Rex Fortescue’s. Taxine, a highly unusual poison which can be extracted from yew trees, is used for the murder. The police find rye placed in the victim’s pocket- which completely baffles them at first. It may be a clever red herring to lead the case to the MacKenzies (again the Blackbird Mine incident) but somehow it works against the murderer instead, by putting Miss Marple on the right track to discovery later in the story.
The Queen was in the parlour, eating bread and honey.
The second victim lies in Adele Fortescue, the young and beautiful wife of Rex (and hence, the Queen). While having her afternoon tea she is poisoned with cyanide, fulfilling the verse in the rhyme.
The maid was in the garden, hanging out the clothes;
When down come a blackbird, and nipped off her nose.
Gladys, a maid in the household is found dead in the garden. This is where Miss Marple comes in; Gladys was previously employed and trained by her. Outraged by the immodesty that the killer had shown by putting a clothes peg on the victim’s nose, Miss Marple is more determined than ever to uncover the truth behind the series of killings.
Taken as a whole, this is a decent story and one of Marple’s best. The use of nursery rhyme here makes more sense than that in Five Little Pigs, but somehow seems to serve not much purpose other than to please the audience and perhaps to a degree, to show what a childlike mind the murderer has.
The rhyme is also employed in two other short stories by Christie. Sing a Song of Sixpence appears as part of a collection in The Listerdale Mystery and Witness for the Prosecution and Other Stories. On the other hand, Four and Twenty Blackbirds, a short story starring Poirot appears in The Adventure of the Christmas Pudding and also in the Three Blind Mice anthology.
My rating: 4.0/ 5.0
Other titles with nursery rhymes:
One, Two, Buckle My Shoe- 1940
Three Blind Mice (Three Blind Mice and Other Stories- 1950)
Hickory Dickory Dock- 1955
How Does Your Garden Grow? (Poirot’s Early Cases- 1974)
Five Little Pigs
Season 9, Episode 1. Original air date: 14 December 2003.
This movie adaptation of the classic title by Christie starts off great with a dramatic note. It may be confusing to those who have not read the book before this; the background and settings were hardly explained before they get to the major events. Lucy Crale, the daughter of the late painter Amyas Crale is now twenty-one and comes into her inheritance; along with it she receives a letter from her mother who was hanged fourteen years ago for the murder of her father. Although Caroline Crale did not make any protestations of her guilt at that time, in the letter she solemnly swore that she was innocent. Lucy Crale is now determined to clear her mother’s name, regardless of the possible consequences; thus enters Hercule Poirot.
I will not go into details of scenes that follow; sufficient to say that in order to reconstruct the events leading to the murder fourteen years ago, Poirot visits five different people who were present at that time. Philip Blake, best friend of Amyas Crale; his brother Meredith Blake who happens to be a herbalist from whom the fatal dose of poison was obtained; Elsa Greer, now Lady Dittisham who had an ongoing affair with Amyas Crale at the time of the murder; Mrs Williams who used to be a governess in the house and strongly faithful to Caroline Crale; and finally Angela Warren, the disfigured and blind step-sister of Caroline. Each of their account reveals a part of the story, and it is up to Poirot to bring together the various pieces of the puzzle and reveal the truth. If Caroline Crale did not commit the crime, one of the five people must be guilty. Circumstantial evidence at that time pointed to no one but Caroline as the murderer; however Poirot manages to find some conflicting elements that say otherwise.
Overall, this adaptation stays true to the novel except for several small points, such as how Caroline Crale was actually hanged instead of just dying from her illness, and Philip Blake is revealed to have romantic feelings for Amyas, thus his hatred for Caroline; however the essential parts of the story remain unchanged. Five Little Pigs has always been one of Christie’s great masterpieces due to its highly original plot; the only complaint that I have with this adaptation is how they fail to include anything about the nursery rhyme! “This Little Piggy” was mentioned extensively in the novel, with each “piggy” representing one suspect and his activities on the day of the murder.
A greatly recommended movie altogether; beautifully made with the little details reflecting the mood of the story wonderfully. It has the right pace from the start, but things get a little slow in between and viewers may find some scenes getting repetitive, especially when we come to the individual accounts of the story by each of the five witnesses. A convincing performance from all the actors; Aidan Gillen as Amyas Crale stays true to his character as an attractive, philandering artist while Julie Cox as Elsa Greer plays her part to an almost perfection, albeit the heavy makeup and Cleopatra-like hairstyle. A must-watch for all Christie and Poirot fans!
My rating: 4.5/5.0
Genre: Crime fiction, adventure, espionage
One of Poirot’s less outstanding cases, The Clocks contains actually two mysteries. A part of the story details the adventure of the main character, Colin Lamb, who was hunting a spy suspected of leaking secrets to England’s enemies. While following a clue in Wilbraham Crescent, he gets himself involved in a murder case when a young woman, Sheila Webb, encounters a corpse in a house and runs out screaming. The murder scene was bizarre; the body was found in house number 19 where a blind old lady lives, and there were four clocks in the room, all set to 4.13 p.m.
Poirot, who was growing old and restless in his house, was presented with the case by Lamb. Things were made complicated when nobody manages to identify the victim, and when a second body turns up. Poirot correctly deduces that the complex set-up of the crime scene must be for only one purpose; that is to cover up a relatively simple crime.
Overall, The Clocks fails to impress me. However, the plot and settings are promising in the beginning; the complicated set-up with four clocks and a blind lady in the house, as well as the dramatic discovery of the body, are highly exciting to readers. It was obvious that the whole scene was planned and arranged by someone, but who? Can the murder be as “simple” as Poirot claims? The list of suspects in this story is quite long; readers will have to pay close attention to the witnesses’ accounts to spot who was lying, and the significance of it. To be honest, I do not think this is a mystery that can be solved by readers themselves; unlike her other works, Christie did not give much hints this time. I had high expectations for this story, but got slightly disappointed with the conclusion. Still, recommendable for fans of Poirot who are looking for more after reading his more famous cases.
My rating: 3.5/5.0
Here is another review on Agatha Christie’s Poirot series, in addition to my two previous posts. This time, I decided to watch Christie’s short story adaptations instead of the major titles which she is so well-known for, because anything with Hercule Poirot is bound to be enjoyable, right?
1. The Yellow Iris
Season 5, Episode 3. Original air date: 31 January 1993.
One cannot help but to compare this title to its more famous counterpart, Sparkling Cyanide (Remembered Death). Sparkling Cyanide is an expansion of Yellow Iris, where it was written as a full novel with more characters involved, a different motive for crime, and a much more elaborate plot (and necessarily, more bodies!). Asked which one would I prefer, I cannot give an answer to that; both titles are so similar yet so different in their own ways.
Two years ago, while travelling to Argentine Poirot got himself involved in a murder-suicide case in a famous restaurant. A dinner for six on a table turned into a nightmare when one of them, the beautiful Iris Russell, drank a champagne laced with potassium cyanide and died on the spot. A vial of the poison was found in her purse so the official verdict given was suicide; however, the family members were dissatisfied and insisted it was murder. Poirot was prevented from investigating the case when he was arrested by the local police during a coup d’etat, accused of espionage and subsequently “deported from the country like a common criminal!”.
Poirot gets another chance two years later in England when the same scenario happens again. A dinner for six is planned at the newly opened local restaurant on Friday night, with the exact settings as two years ago. Poirot received a yellow iris at his doorstep, as a “call for help”. And thus Poirot attends the dinner party to prevent a similar tragedy from happening, and the case is solved with a little help from Captain Hastings.
Altogether, a thoroughly enjoyable show with some humour, lots of actions, and as usual, clever deductions from Poirot. In the second half of the story the motive becomes quite clear and it was easy to figure out who the culprit is, but the method in which the poison was administered remains a mystery until the end of the story. Highly recommended.
My rating: 4.5/5.0
2. The Cornish Mystery
Season 2, Episode 4. Original air date: 28 January, 1990.
I must admit that I have never heard of this title before I watched this; a shame, considering I have read Poirot’s Early Cases twice. This story is constantly overshadowed by other outstanding cases in the book, such as The Affair at the Victory Ball and The Plymouth Express. In other words, The Cornish Mystery is an easily forgettable story, among the many Poirot’s great cases.
An elderly lady by the name of Pengelley visits Poirot, convinced that her dentist husband is poisoning her. Poirot asked her to return home and he promised to visit tomorrow morning, only to find out it was too late and Mrs Pengelley has died of “gastritis”. However, matters get complicated when the victim’s niece, Freda and her fiance, Radnor, seems to be involved in the case somehow. When the victim’s husband, Pengelley, announced his engagement to his secretary weeks after his wife’s death, he was arrested for murder as damning evidence provided by Radnor and the housemaid starts to emerge.
Poirot returns to the village in time to rescue Pengelley, whom Poirot believed to be innocent. I would say this movie is just average, since there is no solid evidence whatsoever to link the culprit to the case. All Poirot had was a signed confession from the murderer which was obtained by threatening him. The story ends with Inspector Japp shouting and shaking his fists at Poirot while eating a local pastry, much to the delight of Japp’s fans, I am sure.
My rating: 3.0/5.0
Continuing on my latest craze on the Poirot series starring David Suchet and Hugh Fraser, I decided to watch some of the lesser-known titles in the series, some of them which have never been published before. Here is a review on another three titles I have watched recently:
1. The King of Clubs
Season 1, Episode 9. Original air date: 12 March 1989.
Essentially, this movie is just a very short one with a very simple plot. A tyrannical movie studio director was found dead with a blow to the back of his head, in a room within his house where he was supposed to have a late night meeting with a beautiful young actress, Valerie St. Clair. Upon seeing his body, Valerie runs to the neighbours next door, who happen to be playing a game of bridge. However, all is not as they seem as Hercule Poirot is called to solve the case and prevent a major scandal from leaking. The title comes from the one card missing from the deck used by the bridge players. Overall, not a bad performance by Suchet and the others, but the simple plot and solution may be a turn-off for some fans. We expect a lot of cold murderers in Christie’s stories!
My rating: 3.0/5.0
2. The Dream
Season 1, Episode 10. Original air date: 19 March 1989.
The movie opens with an advertisement of the infamous Farley’s meat pies, much to my amusement. Benedict Farley, one of the richest businessmen in England who makes world-class British meat pies, sends a letter to Poirot asking for a consultation, but the meeting itself was bizarre; Farley describes having the same dream night after night where he takes out a revolver from a drawer and shoots himself to death. Concerned that someone may be manipulating him psychologically, he asks Poirot for advice; on the very next day Farley was found dead in the exact same circumstances as described in the dream. It may seem like a closed-room murder or even suicide to the police, but can Poirot solve this case in time to prevent the murderer(s) from escaping with Farley’s millions? Or can the motive be somewhat more than just money? Not one of my favourites either; but if you are looking for something short and light, this may be good for you.
My rating: 3.0/5.0
3. The Adventure of the Egyptian Tomb
Season 5, Episode 1. Original air date: 17 January 1993
The fifth season of the Poirot series opens with a trip to Egypt, where a group of archaelogists on an expedition discovers an ancient Egyptian tomb which had been sealed for 3000 years. According to the local beliefs, those who desecrate the ground will be forever cursed by the Pharaoh. When members of the expedition starts dying one by one, seemingly from natural causes, Poirot is brought in to solve the mysteries. Is this truly the work of an ancient curse, or is there a simpler motive behind these deaths? The only complaint I can find in this title is that it was way too easy to discover the murderer! After going through half of the movie, it becomes apparent who has the biggest opportunity to commit these crimes. However, the motive will only be revealed towards the end of the story. Recommended if you are looking for a good Christie short story; personally I like the Egyptian settings very much.
My rating: 4.0/5.0
Recently I have been watching random titles out of the Agatha Christie’s Poirot series, starring David Suchet as Poirot. The series started in 1989 with Season 1, and is now currently at Season 12, as of 2010. Other recurrent characters include Captain Hastings and Inspector Japp.
So here is a review on some of the titles I have seen so far:
1. Sad Cypress
Season 9, Episode 2. Original air date: 26 December 2003.
When I found out there is a movie adaptation of Sad Cypress, I just had to see it. The original novel has a tragic romance-multiple murders plot that is easily understandable, and likable. Readers can’t help wanting to root for Elinor Carlisle, the beautiful heroine accused of murdering her aunt (Laura Welman) and her love rival (Mary Gerrard) with a fatal dose of stolen morphine. Then there is Dr. Peter Lord, the local physician to Mrs. Welman who fell in love with Elinor and tried desperately to save her from the gallows. Enter Hercule Poirot, and we have a great recipe for murder investigation.
Overall, the movie follows the story quite accurately. There are no major changes except at the climax, towards the end of the story where Poirot unmasked the murderer in the house instead of in the court during the hearing. Elinor had already been pronounced guilty at that time and sentenced to death, but was saved in time due to Poirot’s brilliant last-minute deduction; Elinor and Dr. Lord then live happily ever after. This adaptation is definitely a must-watch for all Poirot fans.
My rating: 4.5/5.0
2. Cards on the Table
Season 10, Episode 2. Original air date: 11 December 2005.
One of Poirot’s most popular cases; as I mentioned before in another post, this title is wonderful due to the sheer simplicity of the murder itself. Mr. Shaitana, a collector of rare items has a hobby of collecting something else; murderers who got away with their crimes. Four such “exhibits”, each with his or her own guilty past to hide, have equal motive and opportunity to murder Shaitana.
The movie does follow the plot and settings quite faithfully, up to the last part where the ending ruins everything. The past that the murderer (Dr. Roberts) was trying to cover up has been altered significantly; although that does not change the motive for murder, it is still unsatisfactory that the story has to end the way it did in the movie. Another significant change is that Anne Meredith ends up with Major Despard, instead of Rhoda Dawes. But the most shocking fact revealed by Poirot may be that Shaitana was playing them all along; he sets up the party and then drugs himself to sleep, being fully aware that he will be murdered. It is a nice twist to the story, although I must admit I like the classic novel much better.
My rating: 3.5/5.0
3. Appointment with Death
Season 11, Episode 4. Original air date: 22 September 2008.
Set in an archaeological site in Syria, this movie deviates significantly from the original novel in more ways than one. The characters, settings, as well as the motive for murder have been altered. To me, Appointment with Death has always been a classic Poirot title; the exotic settings in the Middle East is very similar to Murder in Mesopotamia, which is an equally delightful read. Therefore, I am a little disappointed with the changes they made in this movie; nevertheless I would still say the movie was very well-made.
The most obvious change here is way the murder was committed. Instead of just a simple injection of digitalis to stop the heart, the murderer(s) carried out an unbelievably elaborate plan in order to establish alibis for themselves, before finally finishing the victim off with a stab through the heart. Also, several important characters have been omitted and new ones introduced, who play significant roles in the plot development. Altogether, I must say that I very much prefer the old version of the story, where everything is kept simple and straightforward for readers to enjoy.
My rating: 3.5/5.0
“Ladies and gentlemen! Silence, please!
You are charged with the following indictments:
Edward George Armstrong, that you did upon the 14th day of March, 1925, cause the death of Louisa Mary Clees.
Emily Caroline Brent, that upon the 5th November, 1931, you were responsible for the death of Beatrice Taylor.
William Henry Blore, that you brought about the death of James Stephen Landor on October 10th, 1928.
Vera Elizabeth Claythorne, that on the 11th day of August, 1935, you killed Cyril Ogilvie Hamilton.
Philip Lombard, that upon a date in February, 1932, you were guilty of the death of twenty-one men, members of an East African tribe.
John Gordon Macarthur, that on the 4th of January, 1917, you deliberately sent your wife’s lover, Arthur Richmond, to his death.
Anthony James Marston, that upon the 14th day of November last, you were guilty of the murder of John and Lucy Combes.
Thomas Rogers and Ethel Rogers, that on the 6th of May, 1929, you brought about the death of Jennifer Brady.
Lawrence John Wargrave, that upon the 10th day of June, 1930, you were guilty of the murder of Edward Seton.
Prisoners at the bar, have you anything to say in your defence?”
And Then There Were None/ Ten Little Indians
Genre: Crime, mystery, psychology
With over 100 million copies sold, “And Then” is certainly Agatha Christie’s most popular title out of all her works. The first edition of the novel was published in November 1939, and remains a classic until today. I have reviewed this title in some of my older posts; however I just saw two of the film adaptations this week. Having completed the PC game last year, I decided that there are significant differences between the original novel, the films, and the game, most notably on their conclusion.
WARNING: MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD.
1. The book.
Fans of Christie would be familiar with the plot, the settings and the characters of this wonderful novel. Eight guests were invited to Soldier Island (also known as Nigger Island or Indian Island) by a Mr. U.N. Owen. Upon reaching there, the guests were greeted by two servants, a Mr. and Mrs. Rogers, who arrived on the island just two days before. Altogether, there were ten people on the island, and none of them have met their mysterious (or rather, non-existent) host. The guests were amused to find copies of the nursery rhyme “Ten Little Niggers” in each of their room, and there were also ten figurines sitting on the dining table. However their amusement soon turned to fear, anger, and suspicion when each of them is accused of murder by a voice on a gramophone record that plays during their first dinner. One by one, each of them dies according to the method described in the nursery rhyme, and with each death a figurine is removed from the table. The story concluded with the death of all ten of them, including Wargrave (the real murderer), and a letter of confession is found in a floating bottle which is handed to the police. Thus we have ten bodies and an unsolved case on Soldier Island. In this novel, the motive of murder was to preserve justice by killing the nine guilty people, with the exception of Wargrave himself who ironically, was the only one innocent of the crime he was accused of.
2. The films & TV.
There were altogether eleven film and TV adaptations of the novel, although some of them have significant deviations from the story and the plot. So I would say there are only about five of them that follow the story faithfully; with the first one made in 1945 in the US. Others include the 1965 version of the film, where the settings were changed to a mountain retreat in Austria, and the one in 1974 was set in the Iranian desert instead of an island. In 1987 another adaptation was made, this time by the USSR, with the title Desyat’ negrityat (Ten Little Negroes). The last movie was made in 1989 and was titled Ten Little Indians.
I first watched the 1945 U.S. adaptation, and to me it was just average. There is a lot of humour incorporated into the story, and the ending is not as tragic as it should be. Most of the films follow the ending written for the play (by Christie herself) instead of using the original ending; in the films, Lombard managed to figure out that the murderer is still alive among them and urged Vera to pretend shooting him in order to lure out the murderer. In the end, Wargrave died by suicide and Lombard was able to escape the island with Vera; they lived happily ever after, being the only ones who were innocent of the crimes.
One exception to this is the Russian adaptation of the novel, which follows the plot and ending exactly. All ten of them died, with Vera hanging herself as predicted, and Wargrave shooting himself to complete the rhyme. One minor difference is that Wargrave shot himself while sitting at the dining table, instead of in his room as described in the book.
3. The PC game.
The PC game, which was released in 2005, is significantly different from the novel. Not only that a new character, Patrick Narracott the boatman is introduced as the main character, we also have a different murderer with a very different motive for the crimes (which, if I may say, is totally ridiculous). There are four possible endings to it, and up to three people may survive depending on which path you (as Narracott) chose to take. Altogether, it is a poor interpretation of this classic story, but the gameplay is very enjoyable, with beautiful scenery. Recommended only if you have at least read the novel.